
If you work in restoration long enough, you will run into a claim that hits a wall. You have solid documentation, photos, and clearly justified line items, but the carrier will not budge. At that point, you may consider invoking the restoration claim appraisal process. Appraisal is one of the few industry tools available to help settle a dispute over the value of a loss without going straight into a lawsuit.
In theory, appraisal should be a simple, neutral, and fair system. However, as restoration insurance billing becomes more aggressive and as claims payments are squeezed tighter, many carriers are pushing back on the process itself. In a recent C&R Magazine webinar, One Claim Solution Co-Founder and General Counsel Josh Ehmke explained how insurance carriers often interfere with the appraisal process, what contractors should be watching for, and how to protect the fairness of the process. Here is what you need to know.
Appraisal is a form of alternative dispute resolution included in most homeowner insurance policies. When the contractor or policyholder and the carrier cannot agree on the value of a loss, either party can trigger appraisal. Once that happens, each side selects an independent appraiser, and those two appraisers select a neutral umpire. When two of the three agree on a value, that becomes the legally binding figure.
The idea is simple. Get independent industry experts together to determine a fair value without a lawsuit, court dates, or years of back and forth. When used properly, appraisal brings accountability, reasonableness, and faster resolution to a claim.
Josh explains, “Appraisals are meant to be an independent valuation process. It is meant to determine a fair market value for a claimed payment.” Unfortunately, the reality is not always that smooth.
Many insurance carriers do not like the restoration claim appraisal process because it limits their control and forces a neutral party to assess the loss. There are several common ways carriers try to weaken the process or influence the outcome.
One of the most frequent issues is carriers selecting appraisers who depend heavily on carrier referrals. When someone’s livelihood depends on staying in the carrier’s good graces, they are less likely to rule in favor of the restoration contractor or policyholder. That defeats the purpose of a neutral review.
Even if a contractor selects a good and independent appraiser, the process often still depends on the umpire. The umpire can make or break the outcome. Some carriers may try to control this stage as well by:
If the umpire is not neutral, the entire process becomes skewed.
Another strategy carriers use is simply trying to shut down the appraisal request altogether. They may claim:
However, in most cases, scope is part of value. You cannot determine the true value of a loss without determining the amount of work required. Carriers sometimes use these arguments to confuse or intimidate restoration contractors into giving up. Even in states where the ability for restoration contractors to use assignments of benefits is limited or not allowed, the homeowners themselves almost always have the right to the appraisal process under their insurance policy. In trickier states, getting the homeowner involved can be a good solution for moving forward with the appraisal process.
Insurance carriers may sometimes use tactics to delay or complicate the restoration claim appraisal process in the hopes that the restoration contractor will simply give up. The carrier may bet that the contractor does not understand the process, the policyholder will be scared off, or that the cost of appraisal will deter the contractor. Appraisals are not free. Each side pays their own appraiser and splits the cost of the umpire. Carriers know that cost alone can discourage contractors, especially on smaller claims.
Contractors cannot stop carriers from pushing back, but they can protect themselves and improve their chances of a fair restoration claim appraisal outcome.
Appraisal decisions are based heavily on the contractor’s documentation. If your photos, moisture readings, scope notes, change orders, and justification are clear and detailed, the appraisers have a strong foundation. If the job is not well documented, it becomes much easier for a carrier to poke holes in your work.
Restoration contractors should look at the numbers before pulling the trigger and moving forward with the restoration claim appraisal process. If an appraisal will cost $1,000 to $3,000 between experts and filings, there needs to be enough financial difference to justify moving forward. Appraisal is a powerful tool, but it is not always the right tool for smaller balances.
Neutrality matters. When possible, work with professionals who understand restoration, are not financially tied to carriers, and have a strong record of independence. If the carrier is pushing for a biased umpire, do not accept the pick. If the two appraisers cannot agree, courts can appoint one.
In some states, particularly ones where contractors are unable to use assignments of benefits, the policyholder must demand appraisal. If that is the case, contractors should educate homeowners about the option without crossing the line into giving legal advice. Many policyholders do not know appraisal exists and are grateful for guidance. As Josh put it, restoration contractors can tell customers, “We are willing to stand behind our work and go through the appraisal process,” which often earns trust and confidence.
Appraisal is not perfect. Carriers will continue to exert influence where they can. But even with its challenges, appraisal is still one of the strongest tools contractors have to keep the claims process fair. It allows you to avoid the cost and delay of lawsuits while still seeking a neutral result that is enforceable. When restoration contractors understand the process, document their work, and protect the neutrality of the experts involved, restoration claim appraisals can level the playing field.
To learn more about appraisals, watch the C&R Webinar recording or reach out to OCS.